Any assumed disclosure could cure deception with a simple explanation that the inherently misleading speech is a lie. [Again, both a good point about the unworkability of the current inherently misleading test under First Amendment doctrine and a good demonstration that the test isnt set up to judge tort claims.] However, the rest of the Central Hudson test can also be skipped, and the speech at issue banned outright, if the speech is in fact, misleading. The standard here is not that of a reasonable consumer, but a subjective standard
That's your laptop charger and your phone charger replaced with one thing in your bag
Chopyk J, Bojanowski CM, Shin J, Moshensky A, Fuentes AL, Bonde SS, Chuki D, Pride DT, Crotty Alexander LE
Reliability of adult self-reported smoking history: data from the tobacco use supplement to the current population survey 20022003 cohort
It's not even the most frequent cause of ADHD